Home > News content

Who eat chicken the most cool? Intel / AMD 16 CPU war

via:Expreview超能网     time:2017/12/5 14:02:14     readed:164

The good news is that next week Blue Hole Studios will finally release version 1.0, which is the official version, and we started testing as early as two weeks ago. But just yesterday, TechSpot grabbed a comment on the eve of the official version of the arrival, and is specifically for the performance of the processor test.

Image courtesy of TechSpot's test location

The graphics card used by TechSpot is the single-core flagship GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, the strongest consumer graphics card in the consumer market. However, they did not release specific brand models and no frequency labels, so let's consider it a public version of Founder Edition.

TechSpot uses a very wide range of processors, including Intel's seventh-generation Kaby Lake Core i5-7600K, Core i7-7700K, and the eighth generation of Coffee Lake with all five processors in addition to the Core i7-8700, An entry level conscience choice Pentium G4560.

AMD Ryzen here is the basic, but all the processors in the test are not overclocked, which is a bit regrettable for the Ryzen processor, and memory, TechSpot did not account for what the capacity is, but that can be overclocked Processors, including Ryzen, use 3200MHz of memory, while those that can not overclock, such as the Core i3-8100, use 2400MHz of memory.

TechSpot test site is Pochinki town, specifically, has been running for 30 seconds (I have run nearly 2 minutes before)But this is not the point, the point is TechSpot very perseverance will be very low quality, medium quality, very high quality third gear have to test, rather than our general only choose the highest quality test.

But even so, still no graphics card can reach the frame rate of 144 frames. First look at the very low quality.

Well, in addition to this entry-level Pentium G4560 processor, the high-end all the blue Intel processors.

We can see that all processors on the Core i5-8400 performance are similar, can run out of frame rate of about 120 frames.

AMD here is worse, but not much worse,However, feeling the eight-core Ryzen 7 1800X performance is not as good as the Intel Core i3-8100 feel a bit strange, but Ryzen3 1300X above the processor performance are similar,Logically speaking, the lowest picture quality can widen the gap as far as possible, but in fact it does not.

Medium quality performance is similar, do not look rankings have changed, in fact, everyone's performance is almost exactly the same.

Core i3-8350K above the performance of the processor there is no difference, but AMD Ryzen side of the distinction is relatively large, Ryzen 5 1600 processor can be said that the performance has not been too far away, but the next words are not enough,Of course, the worst is the Pentium G4560, dual-core processor with fixed this game is almost consensus.

In fact, for users with GTX 1080 Ti, very high quality is the most realistic.

However, from the result point of view, even with Core i7-8700K or only the average frame of 108 frames, and the degree of differentiation is still very small, even from the Core i7-7700K to Core i7-8700K, from Ryzen 7 1800X to Core i5-8400 Are test errors, because the gaps are in the 3-4 frame, so you can still see the blue hole for multi-core optimization in fact, there is still much room for growth.

Finally, TechSpot lists the frame rates of several popular processors such as the Core i7-8700K, Core i5-7600K, Ryzen 5 1600X, etc. in the lowest, medium and highest picture quality:

This effect is good, we can do so later

Occupancy rate,AMD processor performance is outstanding, not only the eight-core Ryzen 7 1800X, Ryzen 7 1700 occupancy less than 30%, six core Ryzen 5 1600X, Ryzen 5 1600 occupancy rate should also be lower than the Core i7-8700K, Core i5 -8600K.

And if you compare quad-core processors, Ryzen 5 1500X, Ryzen 5 1400 occupancy even more far lower Core i7-7700K, Core i3-8350K, Core i5-7600K. But conversely, it can also be assumed that the occupancy rate is too low, resulting in performance is not played out.

So if there is any conclusion, first of all, the Blue Hole set 144 limit is too conservative, it is best to lift the ceiling directly, and the distinction between many processors is not enough, high-end processor performance is not completely released.

China IT News APP

Download China IT News APP

Please rate this news

The average score will be displayed after you score.

Post comment

Do not see clearly? Click for a new code.

User comments