The plaintiff, Yuncheng Sunshine Company, complained that it was the owner and operator of Sunshine Broadband Network. The defendant Tencent Company is the owner of the Qq.com domain name and the main operator of the website under the domain name. Through the website under the domain name, Tencent Security Housekeeper and Tencent QQ software can be downloaded and served to users. The defendant Sogou Company is the owner and operator of Sogou Browser. The plaintiff Yuncheng Sunshine Company, the second defendant Tencent Company and Sogou Company are all Internet enterprises, which provide Internet products and services and have a competitive relationship. Second, the defendant is a well-known Internet enterprise, which has great influence and control in the industry. The plaintiff found that when Internet users visited "Sunshine Broadband Network", Tencent Company, through its operating "Tencent Computer Housekeeper" and "QQ" software, and Sogou Company, through its operating "Sogou Browser" software, jointly prompted "there is a malicious risk on the website", the website you want to visit contains false Tencent lottery information"and"what you want to visit". The website has been reported by a large number of users, and false Tencent lottery information has been released for you to intercept "and other content, blocking, blocking the website, preventing users from visiting the website normally, and Tencent Company"Tencent Computer Housekeeper"to publicize and promote.
The plaintiff Yuncheng Sunshine Company believes that the second defendant Tencent Company and Sogou Company blocked and intercepted the website and defamed its goodwill on the grounds that "Sunshine Broadband Network" is a dangerous website, which contains false information and fraud risk and is reported by a large number of users. At the same time, with the help of the fear and doubts of the vast number of users and the consequent demand for security software to protect the computer, we recommend users to install Tencent's security software, which diverts the traffic of the plaintiff's website by improper means, thus increasing the number of users of the two defendants. Website traffic and good reputation are the basis for the survival and development of Internet enterprises. Second, the defendant, as a well-known Internet enterprise with great influence and control in the industry, should play a exemplary leading role. However, the defendant repressed and defamed the plaintiff by improper means, seriously derogated and reduced the plaintiff's commercial reputation and product reputation, resulting in a very bad society for the plaintiff. Impacts and major economic losses. 2. The defendant's actions seriously violate the relevant provisions of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law.
At present, the case is under further trial.