Oppo reno5 series has been released for nearly half a month,DxOMark has just released the image performance of the previous reno4 pro, with a comprehensive evaluation of 108 points, including 109 points for taking photos, 101 points for video and 60 points for zoom.
By contrast,Compared with Huawei's P20 pro, this score is still one point lower, not as good as Xiaomi 9, slightly higher than oppo's own find x2 pro, as well as Apple's iPhone XS Max and iPhone se 2020.
Although reno4 Pro was once the top product of the series, it was only positioned at the middle end, so it's normal to get such a score.
It has a rear three camera, in which the main camera has a 48 million pixel sensor, an output of 12 million pixels, an equivalent focal length of 26 mm, an F / 1.7 aperture, and supports optical anti shake. The telephoto lens has 13 million pixels (output of 12 million pixels), an F / 2.4, an ultra wide angle camera, a 12 million pixel sensor (output of 9 million pixels), and a f2.2. The video can support up to 4k30fps, 1080p120fps, and 720p240fps.
After DxOMark test, it is concluded that,The reno4 Pro camera was mixed. The advantages are more details and better color, but the noise affects the image and video quality. The telephoto lens also has the insufficiency, but is better than nothing. Comparatively speaking, if you don't take pictures while walking, the video performs better than the photos.
Indoor dynamic is extensive
Auto focus accuracy
Acceptable details in bright light
Accurate outdoor white balance
Good balance of detail and noise in portrait mode
Accurate white balance and pleasant color
Rich facial details
Accurate video exposure
The anti shake effect is good in static state
High noise in photos and videos
Under low light exposure, the outdoor dynamic range of the photo is limited
There are halos, ghosts and color quantization artifacts
The scattered scene highlight of portrait mode is poor
When shooting in medium and long focus, there is more noise and less detail
When the flash is off, the exposure is low and the noise is high
Limited video dynamic range
The definition between video frames is different
Low video exposure in low light
Video auto focus tracking is unsatisfactory
There is less video detail in low light or wide luminance range
- THE END -
Reprint please indicate the source: fast technology