Home > News content

Three mysteries in pinduoduo's dismissal of posting staff

via:博客园     time:2021/1/12 16:07:31     readed:51

data-link=

By Gong Jinhui

Source: Gong jinhui2

Last week, the sudden death of a 23-year-old female employee working overtime in pinduoduo caused a lot of uproar. Pinduoduo's public relations operation wave after wave stunned the melon eaters. At that time, due to my laziness, I didn't follow up in time. But it doesn't matter. Today, I'm going to make a good analysis of another big melon.

Seriously, after reading the statement of pinduoduo, I almost believe that pinduoduo's one-sided statement is reasonable and sound. However, after carefully reading this statement for several times, I found that there are obvious loopholes in it. It is not only suspected of avoiding the heavy and taking the light, but also unable to explain what's wrong with it. It's really unconvincing.

Pinduoduo indirectly denied Wang's technical means. Instead, he used the conventional and even a little cumbersome and inefficient method of monitoring first and then asking the employees passing by the shooting place (it is estimated that there are not a few employees being asked), looking for a breakthrough, and finally targeting Wang. After some inquiry, he was determined to be the one who did it.

2、 How does pinduoduo reveal Wang's past comments?

In my opinion, since it is impossible to obtain the past opinions of pulse users by conventional means, we can only use unconventional means, that is, technical means, which is not difficult for pinduoduo. Since I'm a technical Xiaobai, I can't explain the technical principle in detail, but the reason is this one. Therefore, I have reason to believe that pinduoduo used technical means to find Wang's past remarks.

It is worth noting that because the dispute between pinduoduo and Wang involves pulse, pulse statement is particularly eye-catching. Maimai emphasizes that in terms of user information management, it does not provide any third party with user information posted in the professional speech area in any form, and provides extremely strict and complete security guarantee for personal information. In other words, pulse does not actively or passively disclose Wang's personal information to pinduoduo, suggesting that pinduoduo achieves its own goal by using technical means.

3、 The timing of pinduoduo's dismissal of Wang is a bit suspicious

Logically speaking, it's no more than three things. On November 16 last year, Wang made the third extreme speech identified by pinduoduo, which should have been dismissed at that time. Strangely, on December 8, he again made extreme remarks, but pinduoduo has not been dismissed. It was not until January this year that Wang made his fifth extreme speech that pinduoduo killed him and dismissed him directly.

I'm curious. According to pinduoduo's logic, he should have fired Wang two months ago. Why did he delay his dismissal until recently? Is it hard to be merciful to give Wang a 2-month improvement observation period? To tell you the truth, this possibility can't be said to be completely absent, but it's very rare. In my opinion, a reasonable explanation is that pinduoduo expelled Wang first, and then tried to make up a convincing reason (excuse) for the outside world. Believe it or not, I don't believe it anyway.

epilogue

China IT News APP

Download China IT News APP

Please rate this news

The average score will be displayed after you score.

Post comment

Do not see clearly? Click for a new code.

User comments