Tianyancha app shows that on February 22, the civil ruling of the first instance of the reputation dispute between Beijing iqiyi Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing DouWang Technology Co., Ltd. was made public. The case number is (2019) Jing 0108 min Chu 19869, the plaintiff is Beijing iqiyi Technology Co., Ltd., and the defendant is Beijing DouWang Technology Co., Ltd.
According to the judgment, the plaintiff claimed that on September 5, 2018, on the "Douban" website operated by the defendant, the online name "fckjzt" published false content with the title of "more than a dozen male employees and female fans of iqiyi's wonderful shimuang"; the online names "Senior Inspector Chen Xiaosheng" and "maiden rabbit" fabricated false information such as "more than a dozen people in the program group beat one person" To further damage the plaintiff's reputation. The plaintiff held that the reputation rights of the company and legal person were protected according to law. After finding the above untrue content, the plaintiff actively communicated with the defendant, asking the defendant to stop the infringement, delete the articles involved in the case, restore the plaintiff's reputation and clarify the facts; however, for the reasonable demands of the plaintiff, the defendant refused to implement, continued to let the infringement spread, seriously damaged the plaintiff's reputation, brought serious negative impact on the reputation of the program, and seriously damaged the plaintiff's reputation The legitimate rights and interests of the defendant.
During the period of submitting the pleadings, the defendant DouWang company raised an objection to the jurisdiction, holding that in this case, the suspected infringement of the right of reputation claimed by the plaintiff occurred in the "Douban net" operated by our company, which belongs to the "infringement of the personal rights of others on the Internet" mentioned in the above provisions, and the plaintiff's location is Haidian District of Beijing, which belongs to the jurisdiction of Beijing. This case should be under the jurisdiction of Beijing Internet court.
Final verdict: the case was transferred to Beijing Internet court.