1、 Preface: who is stronger in 11 generation core h45 and sharp dragon 5000h?
In the first quarter and the second quarter of this year, AMD and Intel successively released the sharp dragon 5000U / h series mobile APU and the 11th generation core h45 series processor, with excellent performance in all aspects. However, it has always been difficult to reach a conclusion on which of the two processors is more suitable for playing games.
After all, notebook platform is different from desktop platform, and the performance of game book is subject to internal heat dissipation, processor power consumption and BIOS settings. Even two laptops that seem to have the same hardware configuration specifications will have great differences in actual performance, so it is difficult to accurately compare the game performance differences between different processors.
On the left is the Savior r9000p, and on the right is the Savior y9000p
Fortunately, there are as like as two peas in the market, namely Lenovo's rescuer Y9000P and the rescuer R9000P, which are almost identical to the other parts, including heat dissipation, mold, graphics card, etc., except for the A/I which is adopted by the processor respectively. A/I
In view of this, we have chosen these two laptops to conduct a comprehensive game performance test to see which one of AMD and Intel's new generation mobile processors has stronger game performance! In this article, let's first look at stand-alone games.
The detailed parameter specifications of Savior y9000p and Savior r9000p are as follows:
The 2 rescuers as like as two peas in SSD, are almost identical in configuration. Even the radiator is the same frost blade Pro 3. There are 5 heat pipes, of which the main heat pipe is 10mm diameter and the heat dissipation area is 114621mm2.
Salvation y9000p is equipped with Intel's 11th generation standard core i7-11800h processor, while r9000p is equipped with AMD's latest Raptor 7 5800h processor. The specifications of the two processors are as follows:
Core i7-11800h adopts Intel's latest 10nm process. Although it seems to be inferior to 7Nm in number, we all know that Intel's 10nm is not inferior to TSMC's 7Nm and Samsung's 5nm.
The i7-11800h processor based on tiger lake-h architecture is the product of the later specification, in which the secondary cache capacity is as high as 10MB, and the previous i9-10980hk is only 2MB, which is five times as large as the latter. The level 3 cache capacity is also increased to 24MB, which is also more than 16MB of i9-10980hk.
Although the sharp dragon 7 5800h is also based on the zen3 architecture, the difference between the sharp dragon 7 5800h and the desktop version is that the three-level cache capacity is cut to half, but there are still 16MB. Moreover, it adopts a single CCX design, and each core can access all the 16MB three-level cache. In contrast, each core of Ruilong 7 4800h can only access 4MB Level 3 cache.
In addition, due to the reasons of controlling the crystal area and heating, the sharp dragon 7 5800h does not support pci4.0. The processor has 16 pci3.0 channels, of which 8 are for the graphics card and the remaining 8 are for the SSD.
In the aspect of the support of pcie4.0,I7-11800h can be said to be a comprehensive advantage. It not only supports pci4.0, but also 16 of 20 channels can be allocated to graphics cards, that is, pci4.0 x16. In contrast, the GPU of Raptor 7 5800h is only pci3.0 X8.
Here are the screenshots of the two notebook gpu-z:
On the left is the Savior y9000p, and on the right is the Savior r9000p. You can see that the parameters of the RTX 3060 carried by the two laptops are basically the same. The only difference is that the Savior y9000p is pcie4.0 x16, while the r9000p is pcie3.0 X8.
The GPU power consumption of the other two laptops is 130W.
Now we test the heat dissipation capacity of the notebook in automatic mode:
This is the rescuer y9000p. After running Furmark for 30 minutes, the power consumption of the processor is 95w and the temperature is 72.4 degrees.
This is the Savior r9000p. After running Furmark for 25 minutes, the power consumption of the processor is 95w and the temperature is 72.6 degrees.
From the toaster test, we can see that not only the GPU models and specifications of the two laptops are the same, but also the heat dissipation capacity is the same. Therefore, the comparative test of the game performance is relatively conducted under very fair conditions.Related reading: The classic mold is a change! Lenovo thinkbook 16p evaluation: thin and high performanceIntel China vigorously cultivates talents! Three months change your lifeAMD's magic technology gives Intel blood: core i9 performance increases by 50%Lenovo lecoo display Partner Conference