On September 26th, Tesla retreats a three-owner Han Chao released the dynamic saying that he was prosecuted by Testra with the reputation of the violation. The owner released the indictment showed that Tesla requested it immediately to immediately delete all the infringement content and reply on Weibo and claim 5 million yuan.
Tesla called the owner in the prosecution of the owner, issued the relevant statement of the low-level, derogatory second plaintiff (Tesla Shanghai Co., Ltd.). In response to this allegation, the owner said: "What do you mean, although I am fraud, although I should lose more than one million, although you are victim, but you can't say that I am not good, just say that I am not good , You have to pay five or six million costs. "
Previously, In Tesla was exposed after selling major accidents, the owner Han Chao took Tesla on the court, and the trial Tsela was sentenced to "retreat one lost three", and retired from Han Tide to the owner of Han Tong. 2797 million yuan. According to the "Consumer Rights Protection Law", compensate 11.391 million yuan, a total of 15.18,800 yuan.
In this regard, Tesla is not convinced. The judgment finally believed that Tesla had fraudulent behavior while selling a vehicle in Hanchao, and in the case of Han Tide, it did not clearly informed that the Han Tong was not clearly informed, leading to Han Chao to the wrong understanding and then purchased the vehicle. "A trial court determined that Tesla constitutes a fraud first trial judgment." In addition, Tesla's legal reasons for the appeal of their do not constitute fraud are not established, the evidence submitted by the second trial did not be tripped. (Wen | Ai Finance News 裴 岩)