Sina Technology, January 3, Midday, Tesse Right, the corals of the Thazli Reward reminded the right to reputation with Tesla, and she said that Tao Lin said that the solution is proposed, but actual Only a solution is proposed, which is to ask the insurance company to repair the car, Tesla will help her.
Ms. Zhang said that the "unreasonable appeal" said by Tao Lin has given up on March 6. The biggest appeal after this is to hope that Tesla will provide the full data of the vehicle when it is.
The following is Ms. Zhang Weibo full text:
Related content of the reputation case:
Tao Lin, Vice President Tao Lin in April 19, said in an interview, "We put a lot of solutions, we must have need to let customers recognize, but if it is unreasonable, we have no way to meet. She is not Accepting vehicle detection, we must insist on high compensation, we don't have any reasons to meet. I think she is very professional, there should be (people). "
"Her appeal we can't agree, her appeal is unreasonable, and she is not willing to cooperate to do testing, she is only willing to pay high compensation, only accept high compensation"
First, the truth of the facts is that in the maintenance time of the two months before sending it to the Shanghai Auto Show, I have experienced the mediation of several market regulatory bureaus. Tesla only puts a solution, which is the requirements. I agree with the insurance company repaired, Tesla helped me sell. Help me sell a good price. This kind of solution. From the beginning to end, there are many solutions that Tao Lin said, she does not agree with this.
2nd, Tao Lin said, "unreasonable appeal", through many mediations in the market supervision department. I have already given up on March 6th in Tesla staff asked me to write.
After this, my only biggest appeal is that I hope that Tesla can provide the full data of the vehicle when the incident. At the time of the court, I also asked the Tribunal to investigate and pay attention to the market supervision department.
At the same time, according to Article 8 of the Control Law of the People's Republic of China; consumers enjoy the right to recognize the real situation of their purchase, goods or services accepted. "The People's Republic of China" "Personal Data Information Security Law" owner can check or copy its personal information to the information handler according to law; the above laws and regulations are also sufficient to explain that consumers have the right to know their own vehicle data, according to the above laws and regulations , I ask Tesla to provide data, and I can find the legal reasonable compliance of the truth of the accident. However, Ms. Tao Lin, Vice President of Tesla, ignored my country's laws and regulations. No reason to meet! And fall into my appeal is unreasonable!
3rd, Ms. Tao Lin said that I didn't want to cooperate with the test, only accept high compensation, very professional, behind it, and negative news, I provided it. It is more nonsense.
In fact, many Tesla accidents have been reported throughout the country, CCTV, Xinhua News Agency, People's Daily, Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Nanchang, Wenzhou, all included, including CCTV, Xinhua News Agency, Shenzhen, Nanchang, Wenzhou, It is particularly worth noting that Hainan Expressway media reports brake fail events on March 11. The owner can't stop the car, and Tesla employees go to the field simulation experiment. In this incident, Tesla did not have a third-party testing mechanism for judicial appraisal qualifications without the judicial appraisal qualification, and announced the test report of the pre -ly driven version. This obvious potted pot behavior continues to have a wide range of popular discussion, which is well-known by Model3, which is known from the pre-production. The negative news of these public reports has no relationship with me. Who all negative news is what I provide? Tesla This kind of false speech is naked in violation of my reputation.
It has been an over 8 months, and the agent of Ms. Tao Lin is still unable to present evidence proves to court. Instead of Ms. Tao Lin's agent, the behavior of Ms. Tao Lin is a job behavior. Ms. Tao Lin did not have any personal reputation to the media without any fact-based basis. Is this behavior that violates my personal reputation?