Home > News content

Wenzhou's brakes failed to apologize and lighten! Ms. Zhang, the top power of Tesla, doubts

via:快科技     time:2022/5/14 17:00:52     readed:19

Some time ago, Mr. Chen, the owner of Wenzhou, who had previously sued Tesla & ldquo; Mr. Chen, who was braking & rdquo; issued an apology letter in his personal account, admitting that he was fabricating & ldquo; Tesla's brakes failed, automatic acceleration & rdquo; Essence

In the apology letter published by the personal account, Wenzhou owners also revealed that when he was doing the above behavior, there was Shanghai & ldquo; the owner of the surname & rdquo; contact him to introduce him to a platform. cost.

Moreover, Henan Car advocates that ladies and Tianjin owners, Mr. Han, also contacted him;During this period, Ms. Zhang invited him to write a collective lawsuit of the joint book, but was rejected.

After the release of this apology letter, it instantly aroused the uproar of netizens because of the precise & ldquo; cracking & rdquo; the current three people who have a greater influence of Teslavi, & ldquo; Anyang Dingkou Ms. Zhang & rdquo; and & ldquo; Tesla had lost the lawsuit and was sentenced to & lsquo; he returned three & rsquo; Mr. Han & rdquo;.

Tesla said that the discussion of the content of the apology draft was formed under the testimony of the judge, and eventually Chen (the owner of the person) confirmed that all the content and was voluntary and published.

But for this apology letter, Ms. Zhang and Mr. Han also expressed their attitudes respectively, asking for false remarks, and asked Wenzhou car owners to apologize immediately. And they all questioned the rationality of the apology letter.

Ms. Zhang said: The original defendants of the case were Tesla and Wenzhou owners, andThe apology letter mentioned that everyone else is an outsider. Why does the apology letter & rdquo; Is this in Tesla's appeal? Even if Tesla's demands, should the judge be judged?

Secondly, the judge should be clear that this & ldquo; apology letter & rdquo; it will publish all public platforms, or it will have an impact on outsiders in the article. Is the judge who verified the fact that the outsiders are rigorous?

At the same time, should it be clear from a legal perspective? The judge should also listen to the double -hair defense to determine the true situation? In addition, what is the case of the mandatory execution of the case?

also, & ldquo; Retreat for three & rdquo; The owner Han Chao also said that he will consider the trial results of the court and seek judicial ways to protect personal rights.

温州刹车失灵道歉信引争议!特斯拉车顶维权张女士发声质疑

translate engine: Google

China IT News APP

Download China IT News APP

Please rate this news

The average score will be displayed after you score.

Post comment

Do not see clearly? Click for a new code.

User comments