As a relative PC game platform of ldquo; Young & rdquo;, Epic has made a lot of strategies to attract users and occupy more markets.
Some of them are well received by players, such as giving games every Friday.But there are also some that are generally boycotted by players, such as the time-limited monopoly of PC games.
Prior to this, Epic has put on a large number of time-limited exclusive games, including "No Man's Land 3", "final Fantasy 7RE: chapter 1,"Control" and other masterpieces with good reputation and sales.
But for players, being forced to buy games on a platform that they are not familiar with is obviously not an easy thing to accept.
Recently Epic CEO Tim Sweeney revealed in an interview that players will see more Epic exclusive games in the future.
Sweeney said that blockbuster exclusive games such as landless 3 have achieved great results, but for games with a smaller size and a narrow audience, it is difficult to attract players to move the platform through monopolistic strategies.
Therefore, the follow-up Epic will adjust the exclusive strategy according to the feedback of users and previous exclusive transactions.
This undoubtedly means thatThe better the reputation and expectation of the game, the easier it will be for Epic to buy time-limited exclusive rights.
Can you accept this monopolistic behavior? You are welcome to share your views.
User comments