A few days ago, it is reported that Douyin well-known car commentator Cai Jia (Douyin ID: boss Cai) appealed the results of Tesla's second trial.The original judgment will be upheld in this case, and the judgment will be final.

It is reported that in October last year, Tesla sued Cai Jia for infringing his reputation right and claiming 5 million yuan. The court ruled that Cai Jia publicly apologized to Tesla and compensated Tesla 100000 yuan.

In response, Cai Jia refused to accept the verdict and appealed.After the hearing of the higher people's Court of Zhejiang Province, the relevant case made a final judgment and upheld the original judgment.

According to previous reports, Cai Jia is an online celebrity car critic & ldquo; Cai Boss & rdquo;, Douyin has more than 4 million followers. He had said that the second time he received an indictment from Tesla, Tesla claimed 5 million yuan and demanded a public apology.

Its feud with Tesla & ldquo; & rdquo; lies in & ldquo; Boss Cai & rdquo; revealed in a video in 2021 that one of his friends was one of Tesla's suppliers.Tesla adopted measures such as low quotation, strict settlement method or cycle to the supplier after localization.

This move may cause problems with the quality of suppliers' products, while Tesla's personnel in charge of inspection as well as supplier personnel have behaviors such as ldquo; eating card takers and rdquo;.

Tesla complained against the above content because there is no evidence to support the authenticity of the above content. And & ldquo; Boss Cai & rdquo; said that the above content belongs to a friend's revelation, but it is impossible to ask this & ldquo; friend & rdquo; to testify on his behalf.

After the court hearing, the verdict of first instance: Cai Jia publicly apologized to Tesla and compensated Tesla 100000 yuan. The court held that the video content of ldquo; Boss Cai & rdquo; was not based on facts and belonged to fabricating false facts.

And & ldquo; Boss Cai & rdquo; in the video is more fierce, with obvious insulting and negative comments, has gone beyond the reasonable scope of supervision and criticism, with the intention of insulting and slandering Tesla company.