On May 25, Tesla said in an official document that Ms. Zhang, the female owner of the roof of the Shanghai Auto Show, sued Tesla's reputation dispute and personal information protection dispute. The court of first instance heard the case and decided to reject all Ms. Zhang's claims in the two cases, that is to say, Tesla won and Ms. Zhang lost.

In this regard, Ms. Zhang made it clear that she will certainly appeal, & ldquo; as a party, I cannot accept, because their remarks to me are based on personality and non-existent facts. If they can't prove that there is someone and a team behind me, they will apologize to me. & rdquo

In addition, Ms. Zhang also said that she also received judgments in three cases at the same time, of which two were not supported by the court and one won.It was her victory in the case of infringement of reputation brought to the self-media Rhino Finance.

In Ms. Zhang's judgment, the court found that the fact was that the plaintiff, Ms. Zhang, questioned the quality of Tesla's products and had a dispute with Tesla, which aroused public opinion and media attention.

On May 16, 2021, the defendant Beijing Rhino posted a circle of friends of Tesla's female car owners on its rhino financial website. "the article.

It is said that Ms. Zhang & the men behind ldquo;‘ & rsquo; is either fighting or illegal crime or illegal deposit taking & rdquo;, has such people & ldquo; backing & rdquo;,“ No wonder Ms. Zhang dared to go to the Shanghai Auto Show & lsquo; Splashy Roll & rsquo;” and so on.

After the above articles were published, they were reprinted online by other relevant media, and some netizens made negative comments on the plaintiff, Ms. Zhang's Weibo.

Verified by the court, the referee documents, corporate information and shareholder information referred to in this article are not the same person as the plaintiff Li's book (that is, Ms. Zhang's husband) in this case.

The negative information involved & ldquo; fight & rdquo; and friends'& ldquo; crime & rdquo;“ arrears & rdquo; and other negative information have nothing to do with Li's book in this case.

On August 24, 2022, the defendant Beijing Rhino deleted the above article on its website and posted a correction saying that the enterprise information cited in the ldquo; article and the judgment of Li were not the same person as the female car owner of Tesla's rights protection. I hereby correct, and deeply apologize for the trouble caused to Ms. Zhang and her husband Mr. Li & rdquo;.

On August 24, 2022, the defendant Beijing Rhino deleted the above article on its website and posted a correction saying that the enterprise information cited in the ldquo; article and the judgment of Li were not the same person as the female car owner of Tesla's rights protection. I hereby correct, and deeply apologize for the trouble caused to Ms. Zhang and her husband Mr. Li & rdquo;.

In this regard, Ms. Zhang said, & ldquo; the specific amount of money is no longer important to me, the important thing is that the court found that the other party violated my reputation and demanded an apology. & rdquoAs for the rejected claim, Ms. Zhang said & ldquo; will definitely appeal & rdquo;.