According to news from IT House on September 5, the website of the Chinese Academy of Sciences recently published a new version of the Code of Conduct for Academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (for trial implementation), which was examined and approved by the presidium of the Department of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and approved by the leading Party Group of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Article 28 of the new edition of the Code stipulates that academicians are prohibited from publicly expressing academic opinions that have nothing to do with their professional fields. It is forbidden to participate in consultation, evaluation, recommendation and other activities that have nothing to do with one's job responsibilities and professional fields. It is prohibited to violate the principles of fairness and confidentiality in recommending, judging, appraising and awarding activities.
The main specifications of IT House are as follows:
Chapter II "Code of Conduct for Scientific Research activities"
Article 8To establish the value concept of science, to explore the truth and discover new knowledge as the mission, to serve the society and benefit mankind as the goal, to the scientific spirit, scientific culture as the soul, the pursuit of excellent science.
Article 9He persisted in emancipating the mind, seeking truth from facts and adhering to a serious, strict and rigorous scientific attitude. Abide by the scientific moral standards, adhere to the bottom line, strict self-discipline, and play an exemplary and leading role in the construction of scientific research integrity. Oppose the academic impetuous and grandiose style, oppose all misconduct in scientific research.
Article 10He carried forward the spirit of scientific and technological cooperation and collectivism, respected the labor and rights and interests of collaborators and others, took the lead in strictly practicing academic norms, and made great efforts to cultivate scientific research teams with both ability and political integrity.
Article 11He actively advocated the double-hundred policy of "letting a hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought contend", carried forward academic democracy, fully respected different opinions in the academic field, actively responded to academic questions, and had the courage to correct academic mistakes.
Article 12Strictly implement the relevant state regulations, abide by the requirements of integrity in scientific research, abide by the ethical norms of science and technology, and carry out responsible scientific research.
Article 13Article 13
Article 14To undertake scientific research projects, we should seek truth from facts, strictly fulfill the obligations of scientific research contracts, and use scientific research funds rationally and legally.
Academicians who serve as responsible persons of party and government organs, administrative organs (units) with reference to the civil service law, and principal responsible persons of enterprises shall no longer apply for scientific research projects during their term of office.
Chapter V "prohibited acts"
Article 27It is forbidden to participate in activities that damage the reputation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and academicians. It is forbidden to seek illegitimate interests with the title of academician. It is forbidden to participate in activities outside the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering, academic departments, academic groups and academic journals in the name of academicians. It is forbidden to participate in all kinds of responsive and remunerative activities. It is forbidden to participate in the establishment of non-academic venues with the name of "academician".
Article 28It is forbidden to publicly express academic opinions that have nothing to do with one's field of expertise. It is forbidden to participate in consultation, evaluation, recommendation and other activities that have nothing to do with one's job responsibilities and professional fields. It is prohibited to violate the principles of fairness and confidentiality in recommending, judging, appraising and awarding activities.
Article 29"all kinds of misconduct in the co-selection of academicians is prohibited. It is prohibited to accept recommendations entrusted by any individual or unit without principles; to intercede and greet in the co-election of academicians; to prohibit improper exchanges and exchange of interests with candidates; to accept gifts of various names; it is forbidden to participate in meetings and activities that may affect the fairness of the co-election of academicians.
Article 30It is forbidden to communicate with candidates on matters related to co-opting work in violation of regulations. It is forbidden to divulge Wechat, text messages, e-mails, letters and other complaint information or materials received by individuals related to the co-selection of academicians.
Article 31It is forbidden to disclose to others in any way the discussion, evaluation, complaint, investigation and handling opinions, election results, etc., of the candidates in the selection process. It is forbidden to disclose any information about the whole co-opting process to the public without authorization.
Advertisement statement: the external jump links (including not limited to hyperlinks, QR codes, passwords, etc.) contained in the text are used to transmit more information and save selection time. The results are for reference only. All articles of IT House contain this statement.